Harvard Law Review’s beloved dean of students, Stephen Ball, who was present at the rooftop, assured students in an email ...

The University of Michigan’s (UM) law review journal is allegedly using illegal racial preferencing to achieve a “diverse” board of ...

The group is suing on behalf of three white male, heterosexual law professors who submitted articles in the past and were ...

The University of Michigan is facing a federal complaint accusing the university's law journal of using illegal race and sex ...

Faculty, Alumni, & Students Opposed to Racial Preferences filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday against the Michigan Law Review.

The lawsuit claims that the Michigan Law Review uses personal essays as a means to weed out straight white men seeking to join its staff.

FASORP—whose full name is Faculty, Alumni, & Students Opposed to Racial Preferences—is a voluntary membership organization that litigates against race and sex preferences in academia.

FASORP unsuccessfully sued both the NYU Law Review and the Harvard Law Review in 2018, claiming both discriminate against white men when selecting members, editors and articles.

FASORP dropped its suit against Northwestern University on January 31, but refiled it just a day later. The case is currently ongoing, but Northwestern is currently seeking attorney fees from FASORP.

FASORP is represented by prominent conservative attorney Jonathan Mitchell and by America First Legal, which was founded by Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to President Donald Trump.

FASORP inverts this concept to portray white men as victims, arguing that out of 21 interviews from 2021 to 2024, Northwestern gave offers to only three white men, a rate of 14%.